Looking for a chart stalk

[cnf2013]

I asked in TWW this morning and got no love =(

FF gave me solid CH on CD14, but I had a positive OPK and EWCM after that day. It's held firm and I've remained skeptical. Out of curiosity this morning I switched my settings. FAM gives me dotted CH on CD17 and Research gives me solid CH and on CD17. I've got it set to Advanced right now, but can switch it if that helps anyone. It changes our timing quite a bit, granted it would still be okay, but not as good. I just want to be looking at a correct chart so I know what's going on with my body/testing/expecting my period. TIA

www.fertilityfriend.com/home/55a6a3/

[anonymouseliza]

Huh.

Ok, it's sticking at 14 because the next rise isn't until 2+ days after the additional cm and opk entry. If it had been immediately, it probably would have switched. My gut reaction is to agree with the Advanced interpretation, but there is a really strong case to be made for cd 17.

How much cm was there and how clear was the + opk?

[Rama]

Mar 1, 2015 15:53:29 GMT -5 cnf2013 said:

I asked in TWW this morning and got no love =(

FF gave me solid CH on CD14, but I had a positive OPK and EWCM after that day. It's held firm and I've remained skeptical. Out of curiosity this morning I switched my settings. FAM gives me dotted CH on CD17 and Research gives me solid CH and on CD17. I've got it set to Advanced right now, but can switch it if that helps anyone. It changes our timing quite a bit, granted it would still be okay, but not as good. I just want to be looking at a correct chart so I know what's going on with my body/testing/expecting my period. TIA

www.fertilityfriend.com/home/55a6a3/

I'm leaning more for CD 15 than 14, personally, considering your secondary signs.  But CD14 looks more right to me than CD17 does.

[brettanomyces]

I've had moving CH mysteries before and just had to wait out my cycle to determine which day was my actual O day. I can see the case for 14 and 17 on your chart.

Sorry, I realize I'm absolutely no help at all. FF is great but it's not a perfect science.

[cnf2013]

Mar 1, 2015 15:59:44 GMT -5 anonymouseliza said:

Huh.

Ok, it's sticking at 14 because the next rise isn't until 2+ days after the additional cm and opk entry. If it had been immediately, it probably would have switched. My gut reaction is to agree with the Advanced interpretation, but there is a really strong case to be made for cd 17.

How much cm was there and how clear was the + opk?

Got a very clearly positive around 11am, was definitely negative when I retested again around 630pm. EWCM was a significant amount, showed up on the TP when I wiped. 

[moutonrouge]

I'm with Rama - I think CD15 looks best.

[anonymouseliza]

Mar 1, 2015 16:07:43 GMT -5 cnf2013 said:

Mar 1, 2015 15:59:44 GMT -5 anonymouseliza said:

Huh.

Ok, it's sticking at 14 because the next rise isn't until 2+ days after the additional cm and opk entry. If it had been immediately, it probably would have switched. My gut reaction is to agree with the Advanced interpretation, but there is a really strong case to be made for cd 17.

How much cm was there and how clear was the + opk?

Got a very clearly positive around 11am, was definitely negative when I retested again around 630pm. EWCM was a significant amount, showed up on the TP when I wiped. 

Given that, I'd lean towards cd 17 then and leave it on Research or FAM until a + hpt or your period.  SO helpful, I know.

[cnf2013]

Mar 1, 2015 16:16:57 GMT -5 anonymouseliza said:

Mar 1, 2015 16:07:43 GMT -5 cnf2013 said:

Got a very clearly positive around 11am, was definitely negative when I retested again around 630pm. EWCM was a significant amount, showed up on the TP when I wiped. 

Given that, I'd lean towards cd 17 then and leave it on Research or FAM until a + hpt or your period.  SO helpful, I know.

It is helpful. Everyone who spoke up has made me feel better. I never agreed with those CH and was surprised the day they showed up, fully expecting them to be moved at some point. But I'm pretty new to charting and thought maybe I was missing something in my confusion. I'm glad I'm not the only one who is questioning it. 

[ceejay]

Mar 1, 2015 16:08:35 GMT -5 moutonrouge said:

I'm with Rama - I think CD15 looks best.

I agree with these ladies. If you didn't have that low temp on CD17, then I think CD15 would look even more convincing for O day.

[getzystark]

+1 for CD 15!

[ghostmonkey]

Mar 1, 2015 16:00:12 GMT -5 Rama said:

Mar 1, 2015 15:53:29 GMT -5 cnf2013 said:

I asked in TWW this morning and got no love =(

FF gave me solid CH on CD14, but I had a positive OPK and EWCM after that day. It's held firm and I've remained skeptical. Out of curiosity this morning I switched my settings. FAM gives me dotted CH on CD17 and Research gives me solid CH and on CD17. I've got it set to Advanced right now, but can switch it if that helps anyone. It changes our timing quite a bit, granted it would still be okay, but not as good. I just want to be looking at a correct chart so I know what's going on with my body/testing/expecting my period. TIA

www.fertilityfriend.com/home/55a6a3/

I'm leaning more for CD 15 than 14, personally, considering your secondary signs.  But CD14 looks more right to me than CD17 does.

That's where I'm at too.

[Sparkly]

I'm on team CD15. I was going to comment when lurking TWW earlier but forgot.

[cnf2013]

Sounds like CD15 might be a winner. Is it terrible if I override FF and plug that in? Or should I just leave it and live with it as is?

[Rama]

Mar 1, 2015 17:50:48 GMT -5 cnf2013 said:

Sounds like CD15 might be a winner. Is it terrible if I override FF and plug that in? Or should I just leave it and live with it as is?

Eh, I'd leave it.  It could still change its mind and if not, you know better anyway.